More copy edits and content updates.

[import/samba-docs-svnimport.git] / Samba3-HOWTO / TOSHARG-PDC.xml

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//Samba-Team//DTD DocBook V4.2-Based Variant V1.0//EN" "http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc">
<chapter id="samba-pdc">

<chapterinfo>
        &author.jht;
        &author.jerry;
        &author.dbannon;
        <author>&person.gd; <contrib>LDAP updates</contrib></author>
</chapterinfo>

<title>Domain Control</title>

<para>
There are many who approach MS Windows networking with incredible misconceptions.
That's okay, because it gives the rest of us plenty of opportunity to be of assistance.
Those who really want help are well advised to become familiar with information
that is already available.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>controller</secondary></indexterm>
You are advised not to tackle this section without having first understood
and mastered some basics. MS Windows networking is not particularly forgiving of
misconfiguration. Users of MS Windows networking are likely to complain 
of persistent niggles that may be caused by a broken network configuration.
To a great many people, however, MS Windows networking starts with a domain controller
that in some magical way is expected to solve all network operational ills.
</para>

<para>
<link linkend="domain-example">The Example Domain Illustration</link> shows a typical MS Windows domain security
network environment. Workstations A, B, and C are representative of many physical MS Windows
network clients.
</para>

<figure id="domain-example">
        <title>An Example Domain.</title>
        <imagefile scale="50">domain</imagefile>
</figure>

<para>
From the Samba mailing list we can readily identify many common networking issues.
If you are not clear on the following subjects, then it will do much good to read the 
sections of this HOWTO that deal with it. These are the most common causes of MS Windows
networking problems:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>Basic TCP/IP configuration.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>NetBIOS name resolution.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Authentication configuration.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>User and group configuration.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Basic file and directory permission control in UNIX/Linux.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Understanding how MS Windows clients interoperate in a network environment.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
Do not be put off; on the surface of it MS Windows networking seems so simple that anyone 
can do it. In fact, it is not a good idea to set up an MS Windows network with
inadequate training and preparation. But let's get our first indelible principle out of the
way: <emphasis>It is perfectly okay to make mistakes!</emphasis> In the right place and at
the right time, mistakes are the essence of learning. It is very much not okay to make
mistakes that cause loss of productivity and impose an avoidable financial burden on an
organization.
</para>

<para>
Where is the right place to make mistakes? Only out of harms way. If you are going to
make mistakes, then please do it on a test network, away from users, and in such a way as
to not inflict pain on others. Do your learning on a test network.
</para>

<sect1>
<title>Features and Benefits</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain security</primary></indexterm>
<emphasis>What is the key benefit of Microsoft Domain Security?</emphasis>
</para>

<para>
<indexterm>single sign-on<primary></primary><see>SSO</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>trust</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>account</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>security</secondary><tertiary>protocols</tertiary></indexterm>
In a word, <emphasis>single sign-on</emphasis>, or SSO for short. To many, this is the Holy Grail of MS
Windows NT and beyond networking. SSO allows users in a well-designed network to log onto any workstation that
is a member of the domain that contains their user account (or in a domain that has an appropriate trust
relationship with the domain they are visiting) and they will be able to log onto the network and access
resources (shares, files, and printers) as if they are sitting at their home (personal) workstation. This is a
feature of the domain security protocols.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>RID</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>relative identifier</primary><see>RID</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>security identifier</primary><see>SID</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>access control</primary></indexterm>
The benefits of domain security are available to those sites that deploy a Samba PDC.  A domain provides a
unique network security identifier (SID). Domain user and group security identifiers are comprised of the
network SID plus a relative identifier (RID) that is unique to the account. User and group SIDs (the network
SID plus the RID) can be used to create access control lists (ACLs) attached to network resources to provide
organizational access control. UNIX systems recognize only local security identifiers.
</para>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>member</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>machine account</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>trust account</secondary></indexterm>
Network clients of an MS Windows domain security environment must be domain members to be able to gain access
to the advanced features provided. Domain membership involves more than just setting the workgroup name to the
domain name. It requires the creation of a domain trust account for the workstation (called a machine
account). Refer to <link linkend="domain-member">Domain Membership</link> for more information.
</para></note>

<para>
The following functionalities are new to the Samba-3 release:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>account</primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
        Samba-3 supports the use of a choice of backends that may be used in which user, group and machine
        accounts may be stored. Multiple passwd backends can be used in combination, either as additive backend
        data sets, or as fail-over data sets.
        </para>

        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>replicated</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>scalability</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>reliability</primary></indexterm>
        An LDAP passdb backend confers the benefit that the account backend can be distributed and replicated,
        which is of great value because it confers scalability and provides a high degree of reliability. 
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>interdomain</primary><secondary>trust</secondary><tertiary>account</tertiary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>trust account</primary><secondary>interdomain</secondary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>interoperability</primary></indexterm>
        Windows NT4 domain trusts. Samba-3 supports workstation and server (machine) trust accounts. It also
        supports Windows NT4 style interdomain trust accounts, which further assists in network scalability
        and interoperability.
        </para></listitem>
        
        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>raw SMB</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>member server</secondary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>controller</secondary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>browsing</secondary></indexterm>
        Operation without NetBIOS over TCP/IP, rather using the raw SMB over TCP/IP. Note, this is feasible
        only when operating as a Microsoft active directory domain member server. When acting as a Samba domain
        controller the use of NetBIOS is necessary to provide network browsing support.
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>TCP port</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>session services</primary></indexterm>
        Samba-3 provides NetBIOS name services (WINS), NetBIOS over TCP/IP (TCP port 139) session services, SMB over
        TCP/IP (TCP port 445) session services, and Microsoft compatible ONC DCE RPC services (TCP port 135)
        services.
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>Nexus.exe</primary></indexterm>
        Management of users and groups via the User Manager for Domains. This can be done on any MS Windows client
        using the <filename>Nexus.exe</filename> toolkit for Windows 9x/Me, or using the SRVTOOLS.EXE package for MS
        Windows NT4/200x/XP platforms. These packages are available from Microsoft's Web site.
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        Implements full Unicode support. This simplifies cross-locale internationalization support. It also opens up
        the use of protocols that Samba-2.2.x had but could not use due to the need to fully support Unicode.
        </para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
The following functionalities are not provided by Samba-3:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>replication</primary></indexterm>
        SAM replication with Windows NT4 domain controllers (i.e., a Samba PDC and a Windows NT BDC, or vice versa).
        This means Samba cannot operate as a BDC when the PDC is Microsoft-based Windows NT PDC. Samba-3 can not
        participate in replication of account data to Windows PDCs and BDCs.
        </para></listitem>
        
        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>kerberos</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
        Acting as a Windows 2000 active directory domain controller (i.e., Kerberos and Active Directory). In point of
        fact, Samba-3 does have some Active Directory domain control ability that is at this time purely experimental.
        Active directory domain control is one of the features that is being developed in Samba-4, the next
        generation Samba release. At this time there are no plans to enable active directory domain control
        support during the Samba-3 series life-cycle.
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>MMC</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>SVRTOOLS.EXE</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>Microsoft management console</primary><see>MMC</see></indexterm>
        The Windows 200x/XP Microsoft Management Console (MMC) cannot be used to manage a Samba-3 server. For this you
        can use only the MS Windows NT4 Domain Server Manager and the MS Windows NT4 Domain User Manager. Both are
        part of the SVRTOOLS.EXE package mentioned later.
        </para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>Windows XP Home edition</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LanMan</primary></indexterm>
Windows 9x/Me/XP Home clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this chapter. The
protocol for support of Windows 9x/Me-style network (domain) logons is completely different from NT4/Windows
200x-type domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. These clients use the old LanMan
network logon facilities that are supported in Samba since approximately the Samba-1.9.15 series.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>group</primary><secondary>mapping</secondary></indexterm>
Samba-3 implements group mapping between Windows NT groups and UNIX groups (this is really quite complicated
to explain in a short space). This is discussed more fully in <link linkend="groupmapping">Group Mapping: MS
Windows and UNIX</link>.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>machine trust account</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>trust account</primary><secondary>machine</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>machine account</primary></indexterm>
Samba-3, like an MS Windows NT4 PDC or a Windows 200x Active Directory, needs to store user and Machine Trust
Account information in a suitable backend data-store.  Refer to <link linkend="machine-trust-accounts">MS
Windows Workstation/Server Machine Trust Accounts</link>. With Samba-3 there can be multiple backends for
this. A complete discussion of account database backends can be found in <link linkend="passdb">Account
Information Databases</link>.
</para>

</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Single Sign-On and Domain Security</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>single sign-on</primary><see>SSO</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>SSO</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>validation</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>password uniqueness</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>password history</primary></indexterm>
When network administrators  are asked to describe the benefits of Windows NT4 and active directory networking
the most often mentioned feature is that of single sign-on (SSO). Many companies have implemented SSO
solutions. The mode of implementation of a single sign-on solution is an important factor in the practice of
networking in general, and is critical in respect of Windows networking. A company may have a wide variety of
information systems, each of which requires a form of user authentication and validation, thus it is not
uncommon that users may need to remember more than ten login IDs and passwords. This problem is compounded
when the password for each system must be changed at regular intervals, and particularly so where password
uniqueness and history limits are applied.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>management overheads</primary></indexterm>
There is a broadly held perception that SSO is the answer to the problem of users having to deal with too many
information system access credentials (username/password pairs). Many elaborate schemes have been devised to
make it possible to deliver a user-friendly SSO solution. The trouble is that if this implementation is not
done correctly, the site may end up paying dearly by way of complexity and management overheads. Simply put,
many SSO solutions are an administrative nightmare.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>identity management</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication system</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>SSO</primary></indexterm>
SSO implementations utilize centralization of all user account information. Depending on environmental
complexity and the age of the systems over which a SSO solution is implemented, it may not be possible to
change the solution architecture so as to accomodate a new identity management and user authentication system.
Many SSO solutions involving legacy systems consist of a new super-structure that handles authentication on
behalf of the user. The software that gets layered over the old system may simply implement a proxy
authentication system. This means that the addition of SSO increases over-all information systems complexity.
Ideally, the implementation of SSO should reduce complexity and reduce administative overheads.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>centralized identity management</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>identity management</primary><secondary>centralized</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>centralized</primary><secondary>authentication</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>legacy systems</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>access control</primary></indexterm>
The initial goal of many network administrators is often to create and use a centralized identity management
system. It is often assumed that such a centralized system will use a single authentication infrastructure
that can be used by all information systems. The Microsoft Windows NT4 security domain architecture and the
Micrsoft active directory service are often put forward as the ideal foundation for such a system. It is
conceptually simple to install an external authentication agent on each of the disparate infromation systems
that can then use the Microsoft (NT4 domain or ads service) for user authentication and access control. The
wonderful dream of a single centralized authentication service is commonly broken when realities are realized.
The problem with legacy systems is often the inability to externalize the authentication and access control
system it uses because its implementation will be excessively invasive from a re-engineering perspective, or
because application software has built-in dependencies on particular elements of the way user authentication
and access control were designed and built.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>meta-directory</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>credentials</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>disparate information systems</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>management procedures</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>work-flow protocol</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>rights</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>privileges</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>provisioned</primary></indexterm>
Over the past decade an industry has been developed around the various methods that have been built to get
around the key limitations of legacy information technology systems. One approach that is often used involves
the use of a meta-directory. The meta-directory stores user credentials for all disparate information systems
in the format that is particular to each system. An elaborate set of management procedures is coupled with a
rigidly enforced work-flow protocol for managing user rights and privileges within the maze of systems that
are provisioned by the new infrastructure makes possible user access to all systems using a single set of user
credentials.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards</primary><see>OASIS</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>Security Assertion Markup Language</primary><see>SAML</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>Federated Identity Management</primary><see>FIM</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>secure access</primary></indexterm>
The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) has developed the Security
Assertion Markup Language (SAML), a structured method for communication of authentication information. The
over-all umbrella name for the technologies and methods that deploy SAML is called Federated Identity
Management (FIM). FIM depends on each system in the complex maze of disparate information systems to
authenticate their respective users and vouch for secure access to the services each provides.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>Simple Object Access Protocol</primary><see>SOAP</see></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>federated organizations</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>Liberty Alliance</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>federated-identity</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary></primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary></primary></indexterm>
SAML documents can be wrapped in a Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) message for the computer-to-computer
communications needed for Web services. Or they may be passed between Web servers of federated organizations
that share live services. The Liberty Alliance, an industry group formed to promote federated-identity
standards, has adopted SAML 1.1 as part of its application framework. Microsoft and IBM have proposed an
alternative specification called WS-Security. Some believe that the competing technologies and methods may
converge when the SAML 2.0 standard is introduced. A few Web access-management products support SAML today,
but implemention of the technology mostly requires customization to integrate applications and develop user
interfaces. In a nust-shell, that is why FIM is a big and growing industry.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>interoperability</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>ADS</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>GSSAPI</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>general security service application programming interface</primary><see>GSSAPI</see></indexterm>
Ignoring the bigger picture, which is beyond the scope of this book, the migration of all user and group
management to a centralized system is a step in the right direction. It is essential for interoperability
reasons to locate the identity management system data in a directory such as Microsoft Active Directory
Service (ADS), or any proprietary or open source system that provides a standard protocol for information
access (such as LDAP) and that can be coupled with a flexible array of authentication mechanisms (such as
kerberos) that use the protocols that are defined by the various general security service application
programming interface (GSSAPI) services.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>ADS</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication agents</primary></indexterm>
A growing number of companies provide authentication agents for disparate legacy platforms to permit the use
of LDAP systems. Thus the use of OpenLDAP, the dominant open source software implementation of the light
weight directory access protocol standard. This fact, means that by providing support in Samba for the use of
LDAP and Microsoft ADS make Samba a highly scalable and forward reaching organizational networking technology.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>ADS</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication architecture</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>ntlm_auth</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>SQUID</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>FIM</primary></indexterm>
Microsoft ADS provides purely proprietary services that, with limitation, can be extended to provide a
centralized authentication infrastructure. Samba plus LDAP provides a similar opportunity for extension of a
centralized authentication architecture, but it is the fact that the Samba Team are pro-active in introducing
the extension of authentication services, using LDAP or otherwise, to applications such as SQUID (the open
source proxy server) through tools such as the <command>ntlm_auth</command> utility, that does much to create
sustainable choice and competition in the FIM market place.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>identity information</primary></indexterm>
Primary domain control, if it is to be scalable to meet the needs of large sites, must therefore be capable of
using LDAP. The rapid adoption of OpenLDAP, and Samba configurations that use it, is ample proof that the era
of the directoy has started. Samba-3 does not demand the use of LDAP, but the demand for a mechanism by which
user and group identity information can be distributed makes it an an unavoidable option.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>e-Directory</primary></indexterm>
At this time, the use of Samba based BDCs, necessitates the use of LDAP. The most commonly used LDAP
implementation used by Samba sites is OpenLDAP. It is possible to use any standards compliant LDAP server.
Those known to work includes those manufactured by: IBM, CA, Novell (e-Directory), and others.
</para>

</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Basics of Domain Control</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain control</primary></indexterm>
Over the years, public perceptions of what domain control really is has taken on an almost mystical nature.
Before we branch into a brief overview of domain control, there are three basic types of domain controllers.
</para>

<sect2>
<title>Domain Controller Types</title>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>NT4 style Primary Domain Controller</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>NT4 style Backup Domain Controller</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>ADS Domain Controller</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>powerful</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>performance</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>member</secondary><secondary>server</secondary></indexterm>
The <emphasis>Primary Domain Controller</emphasis> or PDC plays an important role in MS Windows NT4. In
Windows 200x domain control architecture, this role is held by domain controllers.  Folklore dictates that
because of its role in the MS Windows network, the domain controller should be the most powerful and most
capable machine in the network.  As strange as it may seem to say this here, good overall network performance
dictates that the entire infrastructure needs to be balanced. It is advisable to invest more in standalone
(domain member) servers than in the domain controllers.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authenticatior</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>synchronization</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>Security Account Manager</primary><see>SAM</see></indexterm>
In the case of MS Windows NT4-style domains, it is the PDC that initiates a new domain control database.
This forms a part of the Windows registry called the Security Account Manager (SAM). It plays a key
part in NT4-type domain user authentication and in synchronization of the domain authentication
database with BDCs. 
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>controller</secondary><tertiary>hierarchy</tertiary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm>account<primary></primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>machine account</primary></indexterm>
With MS Windows 200x Server-based Active Directory domains, one domain controller initiates a potential
hierarchy of domain controllers, each with its own area of delegated control. The master domain
controller has the ability to override any downstream controller, but a downline controller has
control only over its downline. With Samba-3, this functionality can be implemented using an
LDAP-based user and machine account backend.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>backend database</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>registry</primary></indexterm>
New to Samba-3 is the ability to use a backend database that holds the same type of data as the NT4-style SAM
database (one of the registry files)<footnote><para>See also <link linkend="passdb">Account Information
Databases</link>.</para>.</footnote>
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>netlogon</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>name lookup</primary></indexterm>
The <emphasis>Backup Domain Controller</emphasis> or BDC plays a key role in servicing network authentication
requests. The BDC is biased to answer logon requests in preference to the PDC.  On a network segment that has
a BDC and a PDC, the BDC will most likely service network logon requests. The PDC will answer network logon
requests when the BDC is too busy (high load). When a user logs onto a Windows domain member client the
workstation will query the network to locate the nearest network logon server. Where a WINS server is used,
this is done via a query to the WINS server. If a netlogon server can not be found from the WINS query, or in
the absence of a WINS server, the workstation will perform a NetBIOS name lookup via a mailslot broadcast over
the UDP broadcast protocol. This means that the netlogon server that the windows client will use is influenced
by a number of variables, thus there is no simple determinant of whether a PDC or a BDC will serve a
particular logon authentication request.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>promote</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>demote</primary></indexterm>
A Windows NT4 BDC can be promoted to a PDC. If the PDC is online at the time that a BDC is promoted to PDC,
the previous PDC is automatically demoted to a BDC. With Samba-3, this is not an automatic operation; the PDC
and BDC must be manually configured, and other appropriate changes also need to be made.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>controller</secondary><tertiary>convert</tertiary></indexterm>
With MS Windows NT4, a decision is made at installation to determine what type of machine the server will be.
It is possible to promote a BDC to a PDC, and vice versa. The only method Microsoft provide to convert a
Windows NT4 domain controller to a domain member server or a standalone server is to reinstall it. The install
time choices offered are:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para><emphasis>Primary Domain Controller</emphasis> &smbmdash; the one that seeds the domain SAM.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para><emphasis>Backup Domain Controller</emphasis> &smbmdash; one that obtains a copy of the domain SAM.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para><emphasis>Domain Member Server</emphasis> &smbmdash; one that has no copy of the domain SAM; rather
                it obtains authentication from a domain controller for all access controls.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para><emphasis>Standalone Server</emphasis> &smbmdash; one that plays no part in SAM synchronization,
                has its own authentication database, and plays no role in domain security.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>promote</primary></indexterm>
Algin Technology LLC provide a commercial tool that makes it possible to promote a Windows NT4 standalone
server to a PDC or a BDC, and also permits this process to be reversed. Refer the the <ulink
url="http://utools.com/UPromote.asp">Algin</ulink> web site for further information.
</para></note>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>control</secondary><tertiary>role</tertiary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>native member</primary></indexterm>
Samba-3 servers can readily be converted to and from domain controller roles through simple changes to the
&smb.conf; file. Samba-3 is capable of acting fully as a native member of a Windows 200x server Active
Directory domain.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>convert</primary><secondary>domain member server</secondary></indexterm>
For the sake of providing a complete picture, MS Windows 2000 domain control configuration is done after the server has been
installed. Please refer to Microsoft documentation for the procedures that should be followed to convert a
domain member server to or from a domain control, and to install or remove active directory service support.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>replication</primary><secondary>SAM</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>SAM</primary><secondary>replication</secondary></indexterm>
New to Samba-3 is the ability to function fully as an MS Windows NT4-style domain controller,
excluding the SAM replication components. However, please be aware that Samba-3 also supports the
MS Windows 200x domain control protocols.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>ADS</primary></indexterm>
At this time any appearance that Samba-3 is capable of acting as a <emphasis>domain controller</emphasis> in
native ADS mode is limited and experimental in nature.  This functionality should not be used until the Samba
Team offers formal support for it.  At such a time, the documentation will be revised to duly reflect all
configuration and management requirements. Samba can act as a NT4-style domain controller in a Windows 2000/XP
environment. However, there are certain compromises:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>No machine policy files.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>No Group Policy Objects.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>No synchronously executed Active Directory logon scripts.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Can't use Active Directory management tools to manage users and machines.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Registry changes tattoo the main registry, while with Active Directory they do not leave
                permanent changes in effect.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Without Active Directory you cannot perform the function of exporting specific
                applications to specific users or groups.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Preparing for Domain Control</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>standalone</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>workgroup</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>member</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>security</primary></indexterm>
There are two ways that MS Windows machines may interact with each other, with other servers,
and with domain controllers: either as <emphasis>standalone</emphasis> systems, more commonly
called <emphasis>workgroup</emphasis> members, or as full participants in a security system,
more commonly called <emphasis>domain</emphasis> members.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>workgroup</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>workgroup</primary><secondary>membership</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>machine trust account</primary></indexterm>
It should be noted that workgroup membership involves no special configuration other than the machine being
configured so the network configuration has a commonly used name for its workgroup entry. It is not uncommon
for the name WORKGROUP to be used for this. With this mode of configuration, there are no Machine Trust
Accounts, and any concept of membership as such is limited to the fact that all machines appear in the network
neighborhood to be logically grouped together. Again, just to be clear: <emphasis>workgroup mode does not
involve security machine accounts</emphasis>.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain membership</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>machine trust account</primary><secondary>password</secondary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>trigger</primary></indexterm>
Domain member machines have a machine trust account in the domain accounts database. A special procedure
must be followed on each machine to effect domain membership. This procedure, which can be done
only by the local machine Administrator account, creates the domain machine account (if it does
not exist), and then initializes that account. When the client first logs onto the
domain, a machine trust account password change will be automatically triggered.
</para>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>domain member</primary></indexterm>
When Samba is configured as a domain controller, secure network operation demands that
all MS Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional clients should be configured as domain members.
If a machine is not made a member of the domain, then it will operate like a workgroup
(standalone) machine. Please refer to <link linkend="domain-member">Domain Membership</link>, for
information regarding domain membership.
</para></note>

<para>
The following are necessary for configuring Samba-3 as an MS Windows NT4-style PDC for MS Windows
NT4/200x/XP clients:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>Configuration of basic TCP/IP and MS Windows networking.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Correct designation of the server role (<smbconfoption name="security">user</smbconfoption>).</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Consistent configuration of name resolution.<footnote><para>See <link linkend="NetworkBrowsing">Network Browsing</link>, and 
                <link linkend="integrate-ms-networks">Integrating MS Windows Networks with Samba</link>.</para></footnote></para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Domain logons for Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional clients.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Configuration of roaming profiles or explicit configuration to force local profile usage.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Configuration of network/system policies.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Adding and managing domain user accounts.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Configuring MS Windows NT4/2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional client machines to become domain members.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
The following provisions are required to serve MS Windows 9x/Me clients:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>Configuration of basic TCP/IP and MS Windows networking.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Correct designation of the server role (<smbconfoption name="security">user</smbconfoption>).</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Network logon configuration (since Windows 9x/Me/XP Home are not technically domain
        members, they do not really participate in  the security aspects of Domain logons as such).</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Roaming profile configuration.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Configuration of system policy handling.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Installation of the network driver <quote>Client for MS Windows Networks</quote> and configuration
        to log onto the domain.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Placing Windows 9x/Me clients in user-level security &smbmdash; if it is desired to allow
        all client-share access to be controlled according to domain user/group identities.</para></listitem>
        <listitem><para>Adding and managing domain user accounts.</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>roaming profiles</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>account policies</primary></indexterm>
Roaming profiles and system/network policies are advanced network administration topics
that are covered in <link linkend="ProfileMgmt">Desktop Profile Management</link> and
<link linkend="PolicyMgmt">System and Account Policies</link> of this document. However, these are not
necessarily specific to a Samba PDC as much as they are related to Windows NT networking concepts.
</para></note>

<para>
A domain controller is an SMB/CIFS server that:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary><secondary>brooadcast</secondary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>UDP</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>DNS</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
        Registers and advertises itself as a domain controller (through NetBIOS broadcasts
        as well as by way of name registrations either by Mailslot Broadcasts over UDP broadcast,
        to a WINS server over UDP unicast, or via DNS and Active Directory).
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>NETLOGON</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>LanMan logon service</primary></indexterm>
        Provides the NETLOGON service. (This is actually a collection of services that runs over
        multiple protocols. These include the LanMan logon service, the Netlogon service,
        the Local Security Account service, and variations of them.)
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        Provides a share called NETLOGON.
        </para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary><secondary>master</secondary><tertiary>browser</tertiary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>local</primary><secondary>master</secondary><tertiary>browser</tertiary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>DMB</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>LMB</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>browse list</primary></indexterm>
It is rather easy to configure Samba to provide these. Each Samba domain controller must provide the NETLOGON
service that Samba calls the <smbconfoption name="domain logons"/> functionality (after the name of the
parameter in the &smb.conf; file). Additionally, one server in a Samba-3 domain must advertise itself as the
domain master browser.<footnote><para>See <link linkend="NetworkBrowsing">Network
Browsing</link>.</para></footnote> This causes the PDC to claim a domain-specific NetBIOS name that identifies
it as a DMB for its given domain or workgroup. Local master browsers (LMBs) in the same domain or workgroup on
broadcast-isolated subnets then ask for a complete copy of the browse list for the whole wide-area network.
Browser clients then contact their LMB, and will receive the domain-wide browse list instead of just the list
for their broadcast-isolated subnet.
</para>

</sect2>
</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Domain Control: Example Configuration</title>

<para>
The first step in creating a working Samba PDC is to understand the parameters necessary
in &smb.conf;. An example &smb.conf; for acting as a PDC can be found in <link linkend="pdc-example">the
smb.conf file for an example PDC</link>. 
</para>

<example id="pdc-example">
<title>smb.conf for being a PDC</title>
<smbconfblock>
<smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
<smbconfoption name="netbios name"><replaceable>BELERIAND</replaceable></smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="workgroup"><replaceable>&example.workgroup;</replaceable></smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="passdb backend">tdbsam</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="os level">33</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="preferred master">auto</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="domain master">yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="local master">yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="security">user</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="logon path">\\%N\profiles\%U</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="logon drive">H:</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="logon home">\\homeserver\%U\winprofile</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="logon script">logon.cmd</smbconfoption>

<smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="read only">yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="write list"><replaceable>ntadmin</replaceable></smbconfoption>

<smbconfsection name="[profiles]"/>
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profiles</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="read only">no</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="create mask">0600</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="directory mask">0700</smbconfoption>
</smbconfblock>
</example>

<para>
The basic options shown in <link linkend="pdc-example">this example</link> are explained as follows:
</para>

<variablelist>
        <varlistentry><term>passdb backend </term>
                <listitem><para>
                <indexterm><primary>group</primary><secondary>account</secondary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>ldapsam</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>guest</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>default accounts</primary></indexterm>
                This contains all the user and group account information. Acceptable values for a PDC
                are: <emphasis>smbpasswd, tdbsam, and ldapsam</emphasis>. The <quote>guest</quote> entry provides
                default accounts and is included by default; there is no need to add it explicitly.
                </para>

                <para>
                <indexterm><primary>passdb backend</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
                Where use of BDCs is intended, the only logical choice is
                to use LDAP so the passdb backend can be distributed. The tdbsam and smbpasswd files
                cannot effectively be distributed and therefore should not be used.
                </para></listitem>
        </varlistentry>

        <varlistentry><term>Domain Control Parameters </term>
                <listitem><para>
                <indexterm><primary>os level</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>preferred master</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>domain master</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>logon</secondary></indexterm>
                The parameters <emphasis>os level, preferred master, domain master, security, 
                encrypt passwords</emphasis>, and <emphasis>domain logons</emphasis> play a central role in assuring domain
                control and network logon support.
                </para>

                <para>
                <indexterm><primary>DMB</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>encryped password</primary></indexterm>
                The <emphasis>os level</emphasis> must be set at or above a value of 32. A domain controller
                must be the DMB, must be set in <emphasis>user</emphasis> mode security,
                must support Microsoft-compatible encrypted passwords, and must provide the network logon
                service (domain logons). Encrypted passwords must be enabled. For more details on how 
                to do this, refer to <link linkend="passdb">Account Information Databases</link>.
                </para></listitem>
        </varlistentry>

        <varlistentry><term>Environment Parameters </term>
                <listitem><para>
                <indexterm><primary>logon path</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>logon home</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>logon drive</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>logon script</primary></indexterm>
                The parameters <emphasis>logon path, logon home, logon drive</emphasis>, and <emphasis>logon script</emphasis> are
                environment support settings that help to facilitate client logon operations and that help
                to provide automated control facilities to ease network management overheads. Please refer
                to the man page information for these parameters.
                </para></listitem>
        </varlistentry>

        <varlistentry><term>NETLOGON Share </term>
                <listitem><para>
                <indexterm><primary>NETLOGON</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>logon processing</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>domain logon</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>domain membership</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>group policy</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>NTConfig.POL</primary></indexterm>
                The NETLOGON share plays a central role in domain logon and domain membership support.
                This share is provided on all Microsoft domain controllers. It is used to provide logon
                scripts, to store group policy files (NTConfig.POL), as well as to locate other common
                tools that may be needed for logon processing. This is an essential share on a domain controller.
                </para></listitem>
        </varlistentry>

        <varlistentry><term>PROFILE Share </term>
                <listitem><para>
                <indexterm><primary>desktop profile</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>VFS</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>fake_permissions</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary>profile</primary></indexterm>
                <indexterm><primary></primary></indexterm>
                This share is used to store user desktop profiles. Each user must have a directory at the root
                of this share. This directory must be write-enabled for the user and must be globally read-enabled.
                Samba-3 has a VFS module called <quote>fake_permissions</quote> that may be installed on this share. This will
                allow a Samba administrator to make the directory read-only to everyone. Of course this is useful
                only after the profile has been properly created.
                </para></listitem>
        </varlistentry>
</variablelist>

<note><para>
The above parameters make for a full set of functionality that may define the server's mode
of operation. The following &smb.conf; parameters are the essentials alone:
</para>

<para>
<smbconfblock>
<smbconfoption name="netbios name">BELERIAND</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="workgroup">&example.workgroup;</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="domain master">Yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="security">User</smbconfoption>
</smbconfblock>
</para>

<para>
The additional parameters shown in the longer listing in this section just make for
a more complete explanation.
</para></note>

</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Samba ADS Domain Control</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
Samba-3 is not, and cannot act as, an Active Directory server. It cannot truly function as an Active Directory
PDC. The protocols for some of the functionality of Active Directory domain controllers has been partially
implemented on an experimental only basis. Please do not expect Samba-3 to support these protocols. Do not
depend on any such functionality either now or in the future. The Samba Team may remove these experimental
features or may change their behavior. This is mentioned for the benefit of those who have discovered secret
capabilities in Samba-3 and who have asked when this functionality will be completed. The answer is maybe
someday or maybe never!
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain controllers</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>active directory</primary></indexterm>
To be sure, Samba-3 is designed to provide most of the functionality that Microsoft Windows NT4-style
domain controllers have. Samba-3 does not have all the capabilities of Windows NT4, but it does have
a number of features that Windows NT4 domain controllers do not have. In short, Samba-3 is not NT4 and it
is not Windows Server 200x: it is not an Active Directory server. We hope this is plain and simple
enough for all to understand.
</para>

</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Domain and Network Logon Configuration</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain logon</primary></indexterm>
The subject of network or domain logons is discussed here because it forms
an integral part of the essential functionality that is provided by a domain controller.
</para>

<sect2>
<title>Domain Network Logon Service</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain logon</primary></indexterm>
All domain controllers must run the netlogon service (<emphasis>domain logons</emphasis>
in Samba). One domain controller must be configured with <smbconfoption name="domain master">Yes</smbconfoption>
(the PDC); on all BDCs set the parameter <smbconfoption name="domain master">No</smbconfoption>.
</para>

<sect3>
<title>Example Configuration</title>

<example id="PDC-config">
<title>smb.conf for being a PDC</title>
<smbconfblock>
<smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
<smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="domain master">(Yes on PDC, No on BDCs)</smbconfoption>

<smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
<smbconfoption name="comment">Network Logon Service</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
<smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
</smbconfblock>
</example>

</sect3>
<sect3>
<title>The Special Case of MS Windows XP Home Edition</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>Windows XP Home edition</primary></indexterm>
To be completely clear: If you want MS Windows XP Home Edition to integrate with your
MS Windows NT4 or Active Directory domain security, understand it cannot be done.
The only option is to purchase the upgrade from MS Windows XP Home Edition to
MS Windows XP Professional.
</para>

<note><para>
MS Windows XP Home Edition does not have the ability to join any type of domain
security facility. Unlike MS Windows 9x/Me, MS Windows XP Home Edition also completely
lacks the ability to log onto a network.
</para></note>

<para>
Now that this has been said, please do not ask the mailing list or email any of the
Samba Team members with your questions asking how to make this work. It can't be done.
If it can be done, then to do so would violate your software license agreement with
Microsoft, and we recommend that you do not do that.
</para>

</sect3>

<sect3>
<title>The Special Case of Windows 9x/Me</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>domain</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>workgroup</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>authentication</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>rights</primary></indexterm>
A domain and a workgroup are exactly the same in terms of network
browsing. The difference is that a distributable authentication
database is associated with a domain, for secure login access to a
network. Also, different access rights can be granted to users if they
successfully authenticate against a domain logon server. Samba-3 does this
now in the same way as MS Windows NT/200x.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
The SMB client logging on to a domain has an expectation that every other
server in the domain should accept the same authentication information.
Network browsing functionality of domains and workgroups is identical and
is explained in this documentation under the browsing discussions.
It should be noted that browsing is totally orthogonal to logon support.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>single-logon</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain logons</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>network logon</primary></indexterm>
Issues related to the single-logon network model are discussed in this
section. Samba supports domain logons, network logon scripts, and user
profiles for MS Windows for Workgroups and MS Windows 9x/Me clients,
which are the focus of this section.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>broadcast request</primary></indexterm>
When an SMB client in a domain wishes to log on, it broadcasts requests for a logon server. The first one to
reply gets the job and validates its password using whatever mechanism the Samba administrator has installed.
It is possible (but ill advised) to create a domain where the user database is not shared between servers;
that is, they are effectively workgroup servers advertising themselves as participating in a domain. This
demonstrates how authentication is quite different from but closely involved with domains.
</para>

<para>
Using these features, you can make your clients verify their logon via
the Samba server, make clients run a batch file when they log on to
the network and download their preferences, desktop, and start menu.
</para>

<para><emphasis>
MS Windows XP Home edition is not able to join a domain and does not permit the use of domain logons.
</emphasis></para>

<para>
Before launching into the configuration instructions, it is worthwhile to look at how a Windows 9x/Me client
performs a logon:
</para>

<orderedlist>
<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt;</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>logon server</primary></indexterm>
        The client broadcasts (to the IP broadcast address of the subnet it is in)
        a NetLogon request. This is sent to the NetBIOS name DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; at the
        NetBIOS layer. The client chooses the first response it receives, which
        contains the NetBIOS name of the logon server to use in the format of 
        <filename>\\SERVER</filename>. The <literal>1C</literal> name is the name
        type that is registered by domain controllers (SMB/CIFS servers that provide
        the netlogon service).
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>IPC$</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>SMBsessetupX</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>SMBtconX</primary></indexterm>
        The client connects to that server, logs on (does an SMBsessetupX) and
        then connects to the IPC$ share (using an SMBtconX).
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>NetWkstaUserLogon</primary></indexterm>
        The client does a NetWkstaUserLogon request, which retrieves the name
        of the user's logon script. 
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        The client then connects to the NetLogon share and searches for said script.    
        If it is found and can be read, it is retrieved and executed by the client.
        After this, the client disconnects from the NetLogon share.
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>NetUserGetInfo</primary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>profile</primary></indexterm>
        The client sends a NetUserGetInfo request to the server to retrieve
        the user's home share, which is used to search for profiles. Since the
        response to the NetUserGetInfo request does not contain much more than  
        the user's home share, profiles for Windows 9x clients must reside in the user
        home directory.
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>profiles</primary></indexterm>
        The client connects to the user's home share and searches for the 
        user's profile. As it turns out, you can specify the user's home share as
        a share name and path. For example, <filename>\\server\fred\.winprofile</filename>.
        If the profiles are found, they are implemented.
        </para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
        <para>
        <indexterm><primary>CONFIG.POL</primary></indexterm>
        The client then disconnects from the user's home share and reconnects to
        the NetLogon share and looks for <filename>CONFIG.POL</filename>, the policies file. If this is
        found, it is read and implemented.
        </para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>

<para>
The main difference between a PDC and a Windows 9x/Me logon server configuration is:
</para>

<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>password</primary><secondary>plaintext</secondary></indexterm>
        <indexterm><primary>plaintext password</primary></indexterm>
        Password encryption is not required for a Windows 9x/Me logon server. But note
        that beginning with MS Windows 98 the default setting is that plaintext
        password support is disabled. It can be re-enabled with the registry
        changes that are documented in <link linkend="PolicyMgmt">System and Account Policies</link>.
        </para></listitem>

        <listitem><para>
        <indexterm><primary>machine trust account</primary></indexterm>
        Windows 9x/Me clients do not require and do not use Machine Trust Accounts.
        </para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>network logon services</primary></indexterm>
A Samba PDC will act as a Windows 9x/Me logon server; after all, it does provide the
network logon services that MS Windows 9x/Me expect to find.
</para>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>sniffer</primary></indexterm>
Use of plaintext passwords is strongly discouraged. Where used they are easily detected
using a sniffer tool to examine network traffic.
</para></note>

</sect3>
</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Security Mode and Master Browsers</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>security mode</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>user-mode security</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>share-mode security</primary></indexterm>
There are a few comments to make in order to tie up some loose ends. There has been much debate over the issue
of whether it is okay to configure Samba as a domain controller that operates with security mode other than
user-mode. The only security mode that will not work due to technical reasons is share-mode security. Domain
and server mode security are really just a variation on SMB user-level security.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt;</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>DOMAIN&lt;1B&gt;</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>DMB</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>NetBIOS name</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain controller</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>election</primary></indexterm>
Actually, this issue is also closely tied to the debate on whether Samba must be the DMB for its workgroup
when operating as a domain controller.  In a pure Microsoft Windows NT domain, the PDC wins the election to be
the DMB, and then registers the DOMAIN&lt;1B&gt; NetBIOS name. This is not the name used by Windows clients
to locate the domain controller, all domain controllers register the DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; name and Windows clients
locate a network logon server by seraching for the DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; name.  A DMB is a Domain Master Browser
&smbmdash; see <link linkend="NetworkBrowsing">The Network Browsing Chapter</link>, <link
linkend="DMB">Configuring WORKGROUP Browsing</link>; Microsoft PDCs expect to win the election to become the
DMB, if it loses that election it will report a continuous and rapid sequence of warning messages to its
Windows event logger complaining that it has lost the election to become a DMB.  For this reason, in networks
where a Samba server is the PDC it is wise to configure the Samba domain controller as the DMB.
</para>

<note><para>
<indexterm><primary>DOMAIN&lt;1D&gt;</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>synchronization</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>domain control</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>browse list management</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>logon</secondary><tertiary>service</tertiary></indexterm>
SMB/CIFS servers that register the DOMAIN&lt;1C&gt; name do so because they provide the network logon
service. Server that register the DOMAIN&lt;1B&gt; name are DMBs &smbmdash; meaning that they are responsible
for browse list synchronization across all machines that have registered the DOMAIN&lt;1D&gt; name. The later
are LMBs that have the responsibility to listen to all NetBIOS name registrations that occur locally to their
own network segment. The network logon service (NETLOGON) is germane to domain control and has nothing to do
with network browsing and browse list management. The 1C and 1B/1D name services are orthogonal to each
other.
</para></note>

<para>
Now back to the issue of configuring a Samba domain controller to use a mode other than <smbconfoption
name="security">user</smbconfoption>. If a Samba host is configured to use another SMB server or domain
controller in order to validate user connection requests, it is a fact that some other machine on the network
(the <smbconfoption name="password server"/>) knows more about the user than the Samba host. About 99 percent
of the time, this other host is a domain controller. Now to operate in domain mode security, the
<smbconfoption name="workgroup"/> parameter must be set to the name of the Windows NT domain (which already
has a domain controller).  If the domain does not already have a domain controller, you do not yet have a
domain.
</para>

<para>
Configuring a Samba box as a domain controller for a domain that already by definition has a
PDC is asking for trouble. Therefore, you should always configure the Samba domain controller
to be the DMB for its domain and set <smbconfoption name="security">user</smbconfoption>.
This is the only officially supported mode of operation.
</para>

</sect2>

</sect1>

<sect1>
<title>Common Errors</title>

<sect2>
<title><quote>$</quote> Cannot Be Included in Machine Name</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>BSD</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>FreeBSD</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>/etc/passwd</primary></indexterm>
A machine account, typically stored in <filename>/etc/passwd</filename>, takes the form of the machine
name with a <quote>$</quote> appended. Some BSD systems will not create a user with a <quote>$</quote> in the name.
Recent versions of FreeBSD have removed this limitation, but older releases are still in common use.
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>vipw</primary></indexterm>
The problem is only in the program used to make the entry. Once made, it works perfectly.  Create a user
without the <quote>$</quote>. Then use <command>vipw</command> to edit the entry, adding the <quote>$</quote>.
Or create the whole entry with vipw if you like; make sure you use a unique user login ID.
</para>

<note><para>The machine account must have the exact name that the workstation has.</para></note>

<note><para>
The UNIX tool <command>vipw</command> is a common tool for directly editing the <filename>/etc/passwd</filename> file.
The use of vipw will ensure that shadow files (where used) will remain current with the passwd file. This is
important for security reasons.
</para></note>

</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Joining Domain Fails Because of Existing Machine Account</title>
                
<para>
<indexterm><primary>join domain</primary></indexterm>
<quote>I get told, `You already have a connection to the Domain....' or `Cannot join domain, the
credentials supplied conflict with an existing set...' when creating a Machine Trust Account.</quote>
</para>

<para>
This happens if you try to create a Machine Trust Account from the machine itself and already have a
connection (e.g., mapped drive) to a share (or IPC$) on the Samba PDC. The following command will remove all
network drive connections:
<screen>
&dosprompt;<userinput>net use * /d</userinput>
</screen>
This will break all network connections.
</para>

<para>
Further, if the machine is already a <quote>member of a workgroup</quote> that is the same name as the domain
you are joining (bad idea), you will get this message. Change the workgroup name to something else &smbmdash;
it does not matter what &smbmdash; reboot, and try again.
</para>

</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>The System Cannot Log You On (C000019B)</title>

<para><quote>
I joined the domain successfully but after upgrading to a newer version of the Samba code I get the message,
<errorname>`The system cannot log you on (C000019B). Please try again or consult your system
administrator</errorname> when attempting to logon.'</quote>
</para>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
This occurs when the domain SID stored in the secrets.tdb database is changed. The most common cause of a
change in domain SID is when the domain name and/or the server name (NetBIOS name) is changed.  The only way
to correct the problem is to restore the original domain SID or remove the domain client from the domain and
rejoin. The domain SID may be reset using either the net or rpcclient utilities.
</para>

<para>
To reset or change the domain SID you can use the net command as follows:

<screen>
&rootprompt;<userinput>net getlocalsid 'OLDNAME'</userinput>
&rootprompt;<userinput>net setlocalsid 'SID'</userinput>
</screen>
</para>

<para>
Workstation Machine Trust Accounts work only with the domain (or network) SID. If this SID changes,
domain members (workstations) will not be able to log onto the domain. The original domain SID
can be recovered from the secrets.tdb file. The alternative is to visit each workstation to rejoin
it to the domain.
</para>

</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>The Machine Trust Account Is Not Accessible</title>

<para>
<quote>When I try to join the domain I get the message, <errorname>"The machine account 
for this computer either does not exist or is not accessible</errorname>." What's wrong?</quote>
</para>

<para>
This problem is caused by the PDC not having a suitable Machine Trust Account.  If you are using the
<smbconfoption name="add machine script"/> method to create accounts, then this would indicate that it has not
worked. Ensure the domain admin user system is working.
</para>

<para>
Alternately, if you are creating account entries manually, then they have not been created correctly. Make
sure that you have the entry correct for the Machine Trust Account in <filename>smbpasswd</filename> file on
the Samba PDC.  If you added the account using an editor rather than using the smbpasswd utility, make sure
that the account name is the machine NetBIOS name with a <quote>$</quote> appended to it (i.e.,
computer_name$). There must be an entry in both the POSIX UNIX system account backend as well as in the
SambaSAMAccount backend. The default backend for Samba-3 (i.e., the parameter <parameter>passdb
backend</parameter> is not specified in the &smb.conf; file, or if specified is set to
<literal>smbpasswd</literal>, are respectively the <filename>/etc/passwd</filename> and
<filename>/etc/samba/smbpasswd</filename> (or <filename>/usr/local/samba/lib/private/smbpasswd</filename> if
compiled using Samba Team default settings). The use of the <filename>/etc/passwd</filename> can be overridden
by alternative settings in the NSS <filename>/etc/nsswitch.conf</filename> file.
</para>

<para>
Some people have also reported that inconsistent subnet masks between the Samba server and the NT 
client can cause this problem.  Make sure that these are consistent for both client and server.
</para>
</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Account Disabled</title>

<para><quote>When I attempt to log in to a Samba domain from a NT4/W200x workstation,
I get a message about my account being disabled.</quote></para>

<para>
Enable the user accounts with <userinput>smbpasswd -e <replaceable>username</replaceable>
</userinput>. This is normally done as an account is created.
</para>

</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Domain Controller Unavailable</title>
                
<para><quote>Until a few minutes after Samba has started, clients get the error `Domain Controller Unavailable'</quote></para>

<para>
A domain controller has to announce its role on the network. This usually takes a while. Be patient for up to 15 minutes,
then try again.
</para>
</sect2>

<sect2>
<title>Cannot Log onto Domain Member Workstation After Joining Domain</title>

<para>
<indexterm><primary>schannel</primary></indexterm>
<indexterm><primary>signing</primary></indexterm>
After successfully joining the domain, user logons fail with one of two messages: one to the
effect that the domain controller cannot be found; the other claims that the account does not
exist in the domain or that the password is incorrect. This may be due to incompatible
settings between the Windows client and the Samba-3 server for <emphasis>schannel</emphasis>
(secure channel) settings or <emphasis>smb signing</emphasis> settings. Check your Samba
settings for <emphasis>client schannel</emphasis>, <emphasis>server schannel</emphasis>,
<emphasis>client signing</emphasis>, <emphasis>server signing</emphasis> by executing:
<screen>
<command>testparm -v | grep channel</command> and looking for the value of these parameters.
</screen>
</para>

<para>
Also use the MMC &smbmdash; Local Security Settings. This tool is available from the
Control Panel. The Policy settings are found in the Local Policies/Security Options area and are prefixed by
<emphasis>Secure Channel:..., and Digitally sign...</emphasis>.
</para>

<para>
It is important that these be set consistently with the Samba-3 server settings.
</para>

</sect2>

</sect1>
</chapter>