#include "param/param.h"
#include "librpc/gen_ndr/ndr_irpc_c.h"
#include "lib/messaging/irpc.h"
+#include "libcli/auth/libcli_auth.h"
+#include "libds/common/roles.h"
NTSTATUS auth_sam_init(void);
break;
}
- if (user_sess_key && user_sess_key->data) {
- talloc_steal(auth_context, user_sess_key->data);
- }
- if (lm_sess_key && lm_sess_key->data) {
- talloc_steal(auth_context, lm_sess_key->data);
- }
-
return NT_STATUS_OK;
}
send a message to the drepl server telling it to initiate a
REPL_SECRET getncchanges extended op to fetch the users secrets
*/
-static void auth_sam_trigger_repl_secret(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct auth4_context *auth_context,
+static void auth_sam_trigger_repl_secret(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
struct ldb_dn *user_dn)
{
struct dcerpc_binding_handle *irpc_handle;
struct drepl_trigger_repl_secret r;
struct tevent_req *req;
+ TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx;
- irpc_handle = irpc_binding_handle_by_name(mem_ctx, auth_context->msg_ctx,
+ tmp_ctx = talloc_new(auth_context);
+ if (tmp_ctx == NULL) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ irpc_handle = irpc_binding_handle_by_name(tmp_ctx, auth_context->msg_ctx,
"dreplsrv",
&ndr_table_irpc);
if (irpc_handle == NULL) {
DEBUG(1,(__location__ ": Unable to get binding handle for dreplsrv\n"));
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
return;
}
r.in.user_dn = ldb_dn_get_linearized(user_dn);
- req = dcerpc_drepl_trigger_repl_secret_r_send(mem_ctx,
+ /*
+ * This seem to rely on the current IRPC implementation,
+ * which delivers the message in the _send function.
+ *
+ * TODO: we need a ONE_WAY IRPC handle and register
+ * a callback and wait for it to be triggered!
+ */
+ req = dcerpc_drepl_trigger_repl_secret_r_send(tmp_ctx,
auth_context->event_ctx,
irpc_handle,
&r);
/* we aren't interested in a reply */
talloc_free(req);
- talloc_free(irpc_handle);
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
}
-static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
- TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_context *sam_ctx,
- struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
- struct ldb_message *msg,
- const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
- DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key, DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
+/*
+ * Check that a password is OK, and update badPwdCount if required.
+ */
+
+static NTSTATUS authsam_password_check_and_record(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
+ struct ldb_message *msg,
+ uint16_t acct_flags,
+ const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
+ DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key,
+ DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
{
- struct samr_Password *lm_pwd, *nt_pwd;
NTSTATUS nt_status;
+ NTSTATUS auth_status;
+ TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx;
+ int i, ret;
+ int history_len = 0;
+ struct ldb_context *sam_ctx = auth_context->sam_ctx;
+ const char * const attrs[] = { "pwdHistoryLength", NULL };
+ struct ldb_message *dom_msg;
+ struct samr_Password *lm_pwd;
+ struct samr_Password *nt_pwd;
- uint16_t acct_flags = samdb_result_acct_flags(auth_context->sam_ctx, mem_ctx, msg, domain_dn);
-
- /* Quit if the account was locked out. */
- if (acct_flags & ACB_AUTOLOCK) {
- DEBUG(3,("check_sam_security: Account for user %s was locked out.\n",
- user_info->mapped.account_name));
- return NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT;
+ tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx);
+ if (tmp_ctx == NULL) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
}
- /* You can only do an interactive login to normal accounts */
- if (user_info->flags & USER_INFO_INTERACTIVE_LOGON) {
- if (!(acct_flags & ACB_NORMAL)) {
- return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
- }
+ /*
+ * This call does more than what it appears to do, it also
+ * checks for the account lockout.
+ *
+ * It is done here so that all parts of Samba that read the
+ * password refuse to even operate on it if the account is
+ * locked out, to avoid mistakes like CVE-2013-4496.
+ */
+ nt_status = samdb_result_passwords(tmp_ctx, auth_context->lp_ctx,
+ msg, &lm_pwd, &nt_pwd);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return nt_status;
}
- nt_status = samdb_result_passwords(mem_ctx, auth_context->lp_ctx, msg, &lm_pwd, &nt_pwd);
- NT_STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN(nt_status);
-
if (lm_pwd == NULL && nt_pwd == NULL) {
bool am_rodc;
if (samdb_rodc(auth_context->sam_ctx, &am_rodc) == LDB_SUCCESS && am_rodc) {
- /* we don't have passwords for this
+ /*
+ * we don't have passwords for this
* account. We are an RODC, and this account
* may be one for which we either are denied
* REPL_SECRET replication or we haven't yet
* drepl server to tell it to try and
* replicate the secrets for this account.
*/
- auth_sam_trigger_repl_secret(mem_ctx, auth_context, msg->dn);
+ auth_sam_trigger_repl_secret(auth_context, msg->dn);
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
return NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;
}
}
- nt_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, mem_ctx,
- acct_flags, lm_pwd, nt_pwd,
- user_info, user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
- NT_STATUS_NOT_OK_RETURN(nt_status);
+ auth_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+ acct_flags,
+ lm_pwd, nt_pwd,
+ user_info,
+ user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
+ if (NT_STATUS_IS_OK(auth_status)) {
+ if (user_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, user_sess_key->data);
+ }
+ if (lm_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, lm_sess_key->data);
+ }
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_OK;
+ }
+ *user_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+ *lm_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+
+ if (!NT_STATUS_EQUAL(auth_status, NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return auth_status;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We only continue if this was a wrong password
+ * and we'll always return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD
+ * no matter what error happens.
+ */
+
+ /* pull the domain password property attributes */
+ ret = dsdb_search_one(sam_ctx, tmp_ctx, &dom_msg, domain_dn, LDB_SCOPE_BASE,
+ attrs, 0, "objectClass=domain");
+ if (ret == LDB_SUCCESS) {
+ history_len = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_uint(dom_msg, "pwdHistoryLength", 0);
+ } else if (ret == LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_OBJECT) {
+ DEBUG(3,("Couldn't find domain %s: %s!\n",
+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(domain_dn),
+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)));
+ } else {
+ DEBUG(3,("error finding domain %s: %s!\n",
+ ldb_dn_get_linearized(domain_dn),
+ ldb_errstring(sam_ctx)));
+ }
+
+ for (i = 1; i < MIN(history_len, 3); i++) {
+ static const struct samr_Password zero_hash;
+ struct samr_Password zero_string_hash;
+ struct samr_Password zero_string_des_hash;
+ struct samr_Password *nt_history_pwd = NULL;
+ struct samr_Password *lm_history_pwd = NULL;
+ NTTIME pwdLastSet;
+ struct timeval tv_now;
+ NTTIME now;
+ int allowed_period_mins;
+ NTTIME allowed_period;
+
+ nt_status = samdb_result_passwords_from_history(tmp_ctx,
+ auth_context->lp_ctx,
+ msg, i,
+ &lm_history_pwd,
+ &nt_history_pwd);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ /*
+ * If we don't find element 'i' we won't find
+ * 'i+1' ...
+ */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We choose to avoid any issues
+ * around different LM and NT history
+ * lengths by only checking the NT
+ * history
+ */
+ if (nt_history_pwd == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * If we don't find element 'i' we won't find
+ * 'i+1' ...
+ */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Skip over all-zero hashes in the history */
+ if (memcmp(nt_history_pwd->hash, zero_hash.hash,
+ sizeof(zero_hash.hash)) == 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This looks odd, but the password_hash module writes this in if
+ * (somehow) we didn't have an old NT hash
+ */
+
+ E_md4hash("", zero_string_hash.hash);
+ if (memcmp(nt_history_pwd->hash, zero_string_hash.hash, 16) == 0) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ E_deshash("", zero_string_des_hash.hash);
+ if (!lm_history_pwd || memcmp(lm_history_pwd->hash, zero_string_des_hash.hash, 16) == 0) {
+ lm_history_pwd = NULL;
+ }
+
+ auth_status = authsam_password_ok(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+ acct_flags,
+ lm_history_pwd,
+ nt_history_pwd,
+ user_info,
+ user_sess_key,
+ lm_sess_key);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(auth_status)) {
+ /*
+ * If this was not a correct password, try the next
+ * one from the history
+ */
+ *user_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+ *lm_sess_key = data_blob_null;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (i != 1) {
+ /*
+ * The authentication was OK, but not against
+ * the previous password, which is stored at index 1.
+ *
+ * We just return the original wrong password.
+ * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+ * because this is almost certainly user error
+ * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+ * password from before the password change),
+ * not an attack.
+ */
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ if (user_info->password_state != AUTH_PASSWORD_RESPONSE) {
+ /*
+ * The authentication was OK against the previous password,
+ * but it's not a NTLM network authentication.
+ *
+ * We just return the original wrong password.
+ * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+ * because this is almost certainly user error
+ * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+ * password from before the password change),
+ * not an attack.
+ */
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the password was OK, it's a NTLM network authentication
+ * and it was the previous password.
+ *
+ * Now we see if it is within the grace period,
+ * so that we don't break cached sessions on other computers
+ * before the user can lock and unlock their other screens
+ * (resetting their cached password).
+ *
+ * See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/906305
+ * OldPasswordAllowedPeriod ("old password allowed period")
+ * is specified in minutes. The default is 60.
+ */
+ allowed_period_mins = lpcfg_old_password_allowed_period(auth_context->lp_ctx);
+ /*
+ * NTTIME uses 100ns units
+ */
+ allowed_period = allowed_period_mins * 60 * 1000*1000*10;
+ pwdLastSet = samdb_result_nttime(msg, "pwdLastSet", 0);
+ tv_now = timeval_current();
+ now = timeval_to_nttime(&tv_now);
+
+ if (now < pwdLastSet) {
+ /*
+ * time jump?
+ *
+ * We just return the original wrong password.
+ * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+ * because this is almost certainly user error
+ * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+ * password from before the password change),
+ * not an attack.
+ */
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ if ((now - pwdLastSet) >= allowed_period) {
+ /*
+ * The allowed period is over.
+ *
+ * We just return the original wrong password.
+ * This skips the update of the bad pwd count,
+ * because this is almost certainly user error
+ * (or automatic login on a computer using a cached
+ * password from before the password change),
+ * not an attack.
+ */
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We finally allow the authentication with the
+ * previous password within the allowed period.
+ */
+ if (user_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, user_sess_key->data);
+ }
+ if (lm_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, lm_sess_key->data);
+ }
+
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return auth_status;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If we are not in the allowed period or match an old password,
+ * we didn't return early. Now update the badPwdCount et al.
+ */
+ nt_status = authsam_update_bad_pwd_count(auth_context->sam_ctx,
+ msg, domain_dn);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ /*
+ * We need to return the original
+ * NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD error, so there isn't
+ * anything more we can do than write something into
+ * the log
+ */
+ DEBUG(0, ("Failed to note bad password for user [%s]: %s\n",
+ user_info->mapped.account_name,
+ nt_errstr(nt_status)));
+ }
+
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD;
+}
- nt_status = authsam_account_ok(mem_ctx, auth_context->sam_ctx,
+static NTSTATUS authsam_authenticate(struct auth4_context *auth_context,
+ TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct ldb_context *sam_ctx,
+ struct ldb_dn *domain_dn,
+ struct ldb_message *msg,
+ const struct auth_usersupplied_info *user_info,
+ DATA_BLOB *user_sess_key, DATA_BLOB *lm_sess_key)
+{
+ NTSTATUS nt_status;
+ bool interactive = (user_info->password_state == AUTH_PASSWORD_HASH);
+ uint16_t acct_flags = samdb_result_acct_flags(msg, NULL);
+ TALLOC_CTX *tmp_ctx = talloc_new(mem_ctx);
+ if (!tmp_ctx) {
+ return NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
+ }
+
+ /* You can only do an interactive login to normal accounts */
+ if (user_info->flags & USER_INFO_INTERACTIVE_LOGON) {
+ if (!(acct_flags & ACB_NORMAL)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER;
+ }
+ }
+
+ nt_status = authsam_password_check_and_record(auth_context, tmp_ctx,
+ domain_dn, msg, acct_flags,
+ user_info,
+ user_sess_key, lm_sess_key);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return nt_status;
+ }
+
+ nt_status = authsam_account_ok(tmp_ctx, auth_context->sam_ctx,
user_info->logon_parameters,
domain_dn,
msg,
user_info->workstation_name,
user_info->mapped.account_name,
false, false);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return nt_status;
+ }
+
+ nt_status = authsam_logon_success_accounting(auth_context->sam_ctx,
+ msg, domain_dn,
+ interactive);
+ if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(nt_status)) {
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
+ return nt_status;
+ }
+
+ if (user_sess_key && user_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, user_sess_key->data);
+ }
+ if (lm_sess_key && lm_sess_key->data) {
+ talloc_steal(mem_ctx, lm_sess_key->data);
+ }
+ TALLOC_FREE(tmp_ctx);
return nt_status;
}
.name = "sam_ignoredomain",
.want_check = authsam_ignoredomain_want_check,
.check_password = authsam_check_password_internals,
- .get_user_info_dc_principal = authsam_get_user_info_dc_principal_wrapper
+ .get_user_info_dc_principal = authsam_get_user_info_dc_principal_wrapper,
+ .flags = AUTH_METHOD_LOCAL_SAM
};
static const struct auth_operations sam_ops = {
.name = "sam",
.want_check = authsam_want_check,
.check_password = authsam_check_password_internals,
- .get_user_info_dc_principal = authsam_get_user_info_dc_principal_wrapper
+ .get_user_info_dc_principal = authsam_get_user_info_dc_principal_wrapper,
+ .flags = AUTH_METHOD_LOCAL_SAM
};
_PUBLIC_ NTSTATUS auth4_sam_init(void);