From 17c88758ae82b20bc7260d5d927325f3f73ba33c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 01:30:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Interesting fact found by IFSTEST /t LockOverlappedTest... Even if it's our own lock context, we need to wait here as there may be an unlock on the way. So I removed a "&& !my_lock_ctx" from the following if statement. if ((lock_timeout != 0) && lp_blocking_locks(SNUM(conn)) && ERROR_WAS_LOCK_DENIED(status)) { Jeremy. --- source/smbd/reply.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/smbd/reply.c b/source/smbd/reply.c index 49f4e970282..643b7c2d081 100644 --- a/source/smbd/reply.c +++ b/source/smbd/reply.c @@ -4357,7 +4357,14 @@ no oplock granted on this file (%s).\n", fsp->fnum, fsp->fsp_name)); status = do_lock_spin(fsp,conn,lock_pid, count,offset, ((locktype & 1) ? READ_LOCK : WRITE_LOCK), &my_lock_ctx); if (NT_STATUS_V(status)) { - if ((lock_timeout != 0) && lp_blocking_locks(SNUM(conn)) && !my_lock_ctx && ERROR_WAS_LOCK_DENIED(status)) { + /* + * Interesting fact found by IFSTEST /t LockOverlappedTest... + * Even if it's our own lock context, we need to wait here as + * there may be an unlock on the way. + * So I removed a "&& !my_lock_ctx" from the following + * if statement. JRA. + */ + if ((lock_timeout != 0) && lp_blocking_locks(SNUM(conn)) && ERROR_WAS_LOCK_DENIED(status)) { /* * A blocking lock was requested. Package up * this smb into a queued request and push it -- 2.34.1