From 4b7c274cc0e8110dbd4342c3255972496ea5ced8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:18:39 +1200 Subject: [PATCH] ldb:tests: Correct comment about version numbers (ldb releases have been made while this patch set was in train) Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher --- lib/ldb/tests/ldb_mod_op_test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/ldb/tests/ldb_mod_op_test.c b/lib/ldb/tests/ldb_mod_op_test.c index 6357f83dd02..68b7c79fb65 100644 --- a/lib/ldb/tests/ldb_mod_op_test.c +++ b/lib/ldb/tests/ldb_mod_op_test.c @@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static void test_search_match_basedn(void **state) * - (2) the ldb_transaction_commit() is called. * This returns LDB_ERR_BUSY if the deadlock is detected * - * With ldb 1.1.29 and tdb 1.3.12 we avoid this only due to a missing + * With ldb 1.1.31 and tdb 1.3.12 we avoid this only due to a missing * lock call in ltdb_search() due to a refcounting bug in * ltdb_lock_read() */ @@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ static int test_ldb_search_against_transaction_callback2(struct ldb_request *req * we take any locks in the tdb_traverse_read() handler. * * In tdb 1.3.12 tdb_traverse_read() take the read transaction lock - * however in ldb 1.1.29 ltdb_search() forgets to take the all-record + * however in ldb 1.1.31 ltdb_search() forgets to take the all-record * lock (except the very first time) due to a ref-counting bug. * */ -- 2.34.1