From e784e160ec899a32b673dfaa77fa12c8f27d296c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Lendecke Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:21:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] s3: Remove two uses of smbd_server_fd() Actually, this is a bit cheating. But those two files depend on smbd_server_conn anyway, it does not make things worse. --- source3/smbd/process.c | 2 +- source3/smbd/server.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/source3/smbd/process.c b/source3/smbd/process.c index 782232cd761..51b2e51e091 100644 --- a/source3/smbd/process.c +++ b/source3/smbd/process.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static void smbd_sig_hup_handler(struct tevent_context *ev, private_data, struct messaging_context); change_to_root_user(); DEBUG(1,("Reloading services after SIGHUP\n")); - reload_services(msg_ctx, smbd_server_fd(), False); + reload_services(msg_ctx, smbd_server_conn->sock, False); } void smbd_setup_sig_hup_handler(struct tevent_context *ev, diff --git a/source3/smbd/server.c b/source3/smbd/server.c index 6f4fb5a0e78..36b081a3fe7 100644 --- a/source3/smbd/server.c +++ b/source3/smbd/server.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void smb_conf_updated(struct messaging_context *msg, DEBUG(10,("smb_conf_updated: Got message saying smb.conf was " "updated. Reloading.\n")); change_to_root_user(); - reload_services(msg, smbd_server_fd(), False); + reload_services(msg, smbd_server_conn->sock, False); } -- 2.34.1