From f421aa821869dd138fafe63faf1534a72dabb60e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthieu Patou Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:25:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] s4-dsdb-linkedattributes: register the VERIFY_NAME control, handle it when we are a GC In theory when presented this control and not a GC we should use the specified name as the DC to contact for cross-domain link verification. But for the moment we don't support this so we just fail when we have this control and are not a GC. --- .../samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c index 3ad6f0ca8c4..5ebf4efed41 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c @@ -64,8 +64,59 @@ struct la_context { struct la_op_store *ops; struct ldb_extended *op_response; struct ldb_control **op_controls; + /* + * For futur use + * will tell which GC to use for resolving links + */ + char *gc_dns_name; }; + +static int handle_verify_name_control(TALLOC_CTX *ctx, struct ldb_context *ldb, + struct ldb_control *control, struct la_context *ac) +{ + /* + * If we are a GC let's remove the control, + * if there is a specified GC check that is us. + */ + struct ldb_verify_name_control *lvnc = (struct ldb_verify_name_control *)control->data; + if (samdb_is_gc(ldb)) { + /* Because we can't easily talloc a struct ldb_dn*/ + struct ldb_dn **dn = talloc_array(ctx, struct ldb_dn *, 1); + int ret = samdb_server_reference_dn(ldb, ctx, dn); + const char *dns; + + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + + dns = samdb_dn_to_dnshostname(ldb, ctx, *dn); + if (!dns) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + if (!lvnc->gc || strcasecmp(dns, lvnc->gc) == 0) { + if (!ldb_save_controls(control, ctx, NULL)) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + } else { + control->critical = true; + } + talloc_free(dn); + } else { + /* For the moment we don't remove the control is this case in order + * to fail the request. It's better than having the client thinking + * that we honnor its control. + * Hopefully only a very small set of usecase should hit this problem. + */ + if (lvnc->gc) { + ac->gc_dns_name = talloc_strdup(ac, lvnc->gc); + } + control->critical = true; + } + + return LDB_SUCCESS; +} + static struct la_context *linked_attributes_init(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req) { @@ -189,6 +240,7 @@ static int linked_attributes_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request * const char *attr_name; struct ldb_control *ctrl; unsigned int i, j; + struct ldb_control *control; int ret; ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module); @@ -198,23 +250,33 @@ static int linked_attributes_add(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request * return ldb_next_request(module, req); } + ac = linked_attributes_init(module, req); + if (!ac) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + + control = ldb_request_get_control(req, LDB_CONTROL_VERIFY_NAME_OID); + if (control != NULL && control->data != NULL) { + ret = handle_verify_name_control(req, ldb, control, ac); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + } + if (!(ctrl = ldb_request_get_control(req, DSDB_CONTROL_APPLY_LINKS))) { /* don't do anything special for linked attributes, repl_meta_data has done it */ + talloc_free(ac); return ldb_next_request(module, req); } ctrl->critical = false; - ac = linked_attributes_init(module, req); - if (!ac) { - return ldb_operr(ldb); - } - if (!ac->schema) { /* without schema, this doesn't make any sense */ talloc_free(ac); return ldb_next_request(module, req); } + /* Need to ensure we only have forward links being specified */ for (i=0; i < req->op.add.message->num_elements; i++) { const struct ldb_message_element *el = &req->op.add.message->elements[i]; @@ -409,6 +471,7 @@ static int linked_attributes_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_reques /* Determine the effect of the modification */ /* Apply the modify to the linked entry */ + struct ldb_control *control; struct ldb_context *ldb; unsigned int i, j; struct la_context *ac; @@ -424,17 +487,26 @@ static int linked_attributes_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_reques return ldb_next_request(module, req); } + ac = linked_attributes_init(module, req); + if (!ac) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + + control = ldb_request_get_control(req, LDB_CONTROL_VERIFY_NAME_OID); + if (control != NULL && control->data != NULL) { + ret = handle_verify_name_control(req, ldb, control, ac); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + return ldb_operr(ldb); + } + } + if (!(ctrl = ldb_request_get_control(req, DSDB_CONTROL_APPLY_LINKS))) { /* don't do anything special for linked attributes, repl_meta_data has done it */ + talloc_free(ac); return ldb_next_request(module, req); } ctrl->critical = false; - ac = linked_attributes_init(module, req); - if (!ac) { - return ldb_operr(ldb); - } - if (!ac->schema) { /* without schema, this doesn't make any sense */ return ldb_next_request(module, req); @@ -1089,12 +1161,27 @@ static int linked_attributes_del_transaction(struct ldb_module *module) return ldb_next_del_trans(module); } +static int linked_attributes_ldb_init(struct ldb_module *module) +{ + int ret; + + ret = ldb_mod_register_control(module, LDB_CONTROL_VERIFY_NAME_OID); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + ldb_debug(ldb_module_get_ctx(module), LDB_DEBUG_ERROR, + "verify_name: Unable to register control with rootdse!\n"); + return ldb_operr(ldb_module_get_ctx(module)); + } + + return ldb_next_init(module); +} + static const struct ldb_module_ops ldb_linked_attributes_module_ops = { .name = "linked_attributes", .add = linked_attributes_add, .modify = linked_attributes_modify, .rename = linked_attributes_rename, + .init_context = linked_attributes_ldb_init, .start_transaction = linked_attributes_start_transaction, .prepare_commit = linked_attributes_prepare_commit, .del_transaction = linked_attributes_del_transaction, -- 2.34.1