or should we leave the NetBSD and FreeBSD platforms just broken? Actually these
two *want* to have broken platforms as they use different errno's than POSIX
demands *interntionally*. The POSIX errno ELOOP for O_NOFOLLOW open calls on
symlinks is clear and unambiguous. See http://gnats.netbsd.org/43154 for the
interesting NetBSD discussion on that.
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 10 16:10:02 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
fsp->fh->fd = SMB_VFS_OPEN(conn, smb_fname, fsp, flags, mode);
if (fsp->fh->fd == -1) {
- status = map_nt_error_from_unix(errno);
+#ifdef O_NOFOLLOW
+ int posix_errno = errno;
+#if defined(ENOTSUP) && defined(OSF1)
+ /* handle special Tru64 errno */
+ if (errno == ENOTSUP) {
+ posix_errno = ELOOP;
+ }
+#endif /* ENOTSUP */
+#ifdef EFTYPE
+ /* fix broken NetBSD errno */
+ if (errno == EFTYPE) {
+ posix_errno = ELOOP;
+ }
+#endif /* EFTYPE */
+ /* fix broken FreeBSD errno */
+ if (errno == EMLINK) {
+ posix_errno = ELOOP;
+ }
+#endif /* O_NOFOLLOW */
+ status = map_nt_error_from_unix(posix_errno);
if (errno == EMFILE) {
static time_t last_warned = 0L;