s4-repl: these messages are common, and don't deserve debug level 1

getting older attributes is quite common

diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c
index 9dcf24a6cba49c16e8f2557ef1bb2440bac11bd1..1814b70f2c7e51985e5815abd19190560b98446c 100644 (file)
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c
@@ -2875,7 +2875,7 @@ static int replmd_replicated_apply_merge(struct replmd_replicated_request *ar)
                        }
 
                        if (rmd->ctr.ctr1.array[i].attid != DRSUAPI_ATTRIBUTE_instanceType) {
-                               DEBUG(1,("Discarding older DRS attribute update to %s on %s from %s\n",
+                               DEBUG(3,("Discarding older DRS attribute update to %s on %s from %s\n",
                                         msg->elements[i-removed_attrs].name,
                                         ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn),
                                         GUID_string(ar, &rmd->ctr.ctr1.array[i].originating_invocation_id)));
@@ -3743,7 +3743,7 @@ linked_attributes[0]:
                                            la->meta_data.version,
                                            change_time,
                                            la->meta_data.originating_change_time)) {
-                       DEBUG(1,("Discarding older DRS linked attribute update to %s on %s from %s\n",
+                       DEBUG(3,("Discarding older DRS linked attribute update to %s on %s from %s\n",
                                 old_el->name, ldb_dn_get_linearized(msg->dn),
                                 GUID_string(tmp_ctx, &la->meta_data.originating_invocation_id)));
                        talloc_free(tmp_ctx);