fixed a bug in message handling for code the change notify code

The change notify code registered a separate message handler for each
tree connect. This registration uses the global messaging context.

The messaging code would consider a 2nd registration for the same
messaging type as being an 'update' of the handler, rather than a new
handler. It also would only call the first handler in the linked list
for a given message type when dispatching messages.

This patch changes the messaging code to allow for multiple
registrations of the same message type, and allow for multiple calls
to different messaging handler for one incoming message.

This fixes the problem with the test_notify_tcon() test that I
recently committed to the S4 smbtorture

diff --git a/source3/lib/messages.c b/source3/lib/messages.c
index e4b20c7493493bce097fd354c2fb76e6f26bb0b2..5e11dd4e25148b5bb29668f9aa627f0c1e3f4d7a 100644 (file)
--- a/source3/lib/messages.c
+++ b/source3/lib/messages.c
@@ -286,7 +286,15 @@ NTSTATUS messaging_register(struct messaging_context *msg_ctx,
         */
 
        for (cb = msg_ctx->callbacks; cb != NULL; cb = cb->next) {
-               if (cb->msg_type == msg_type) {
+               /* we allow a second registration of the same message
+                  type if it has a different private pointer. This is
+                  needed in, for example, the internal notify code,
+                  which creates a new notify context for each tree
+                  connect, and expects to receive messages to each of
+                  them. */
+               if (cb->msg_type == msg_type && private_data == cb->private_data) {
+                       DEBUG(5,("Overriding messaging pointer for type %u - private_data=%p\n",
+                                 (unsigned)msg_type, private_data));
                        cb->fn = fn;
                        cb->private_data = private_data;
                        return NT_STATUS_OK;
@@ -317,6 +325,8 @@ void messaging_deregister(struct messaging_context *ctx, uint32_t msg_type,
                next = cb->next;
                if ((cb->msg_type == msg_type)
                    && (cb->private_data == private_data)) {
+                       DEBUG(5,("Deregistering messaging pointer for type %u - private_data=%p\n",
+                                 (unsigned)msg_type, private_data));
                        DLIST_REMOVE(ctx->callbacks, cb);
                        TALLOC_FREE(cb);
                }
@@ -362,7 +372,11 @@ void messaging_dispatch_rec(struct messaging_context *msg_ctx,
                if (cb->msg_type == rec->msg_type) {
                        cb->fn(msg_ctx, cb->private_data, rec->msg_type,
                               rec->src, &rec->buf);
-                       return;
+                       /* we continue looking for matching messages
+                          after finding one. This matters for
+                          subsystems like the internal notify code
+                          which register more than one handler for
+                          the same message type */
                }
        }
        return;