selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V
authorClément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Wed, 6 Dec 2023 13:44:37 +0000 (14:44 +0100)
committerPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:46:41 +0000 (09:46 -0700)
Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
tools/testing/selftests/syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c

index b5d592d4099e85c6ad9d19d36de055eb27415409..d975a67673299fe7fd617c4568e1c3afca93a96e 100644 (file)
@@ -158,6 +158,20 @@ static void handle_sigsys(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext)
 
        /* In preparation for sigreturn. */
        SYSCALL_DISPATCH_OFF(glob_sel);
+
+       /*
+        * The tests for argument handling assume that `syscall(x) == x`. This
+        * is a NOP on x86 because the syscall number is passed in %rax, which
+        * happens to also be the function ABI return register.  Other
+        * architectures may need to swizzle the arguments around.
+        */
+#if defined(__riscv)
+/* REG_A7 is not defined in libc headers */
+# define REG_A7 (REG_A0 + 7)
+
+       ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A0] =
+                       ((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.__gregs[REG_A7];
+#endif
 }
 
 TEST(dispatch_and_return)