netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule removal from chain binding

Chain binding only requires the rule addition/insertion command within
the same transaction. Removal of rules from chain bindings within the
same transaction makes no sense, userspace does not utilize this
feature. Replace nft_chain_is_bound() check to nft_chain_binding() in
rule deletion commands. Replace command implies a rule deletion, reject
this command too.

Rule flush command can also safely rely on this nft_chain_binding()
check because unbound chains are not allowed since 62e1e94b246e
("netfilter: nf_tables: reject unbound chain set before commit phase").

Fixes: d0e2c7de92c7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_CHAIN_BINDING")
Reported-by: Kevin Rich <kevinrich1337@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index e429ebba74b3d13b441f8130087e81153ee1032c..895c6e4fba97ec4ec7cdd721d2bea19729d73b75 100644 (file)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
                if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
                        continue;
 
-               if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+               if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
                        continue;
 
                ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -1477,7 +1477,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
                if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
                        continue;
 
-               if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+               if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
                        continue;
 
                ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -2910,6 +2910,9 @@ static int nf_tables_delchain(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
                return PTR_ERR(chain);
        }
 
+       if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
+               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
        nft_ctx_init(&ctx, net, skb, info->nlh, family, table, chain, nla);
 
        if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HOOK]) {
@@ -3971,6 +3974,11 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
        }
 
        if (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
+               if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) {
+                       err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+                       goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
+               }
+
                err = nft_delrule(&ctx, old_rule);
                if (err < 0)
                        goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
@@ -4078,7 +4086,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
                        NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN]);
                        return PTR_ERR(chain);
                }
-               if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+               if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
                        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
        }
 
@@ -4112,7 +4120,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
                list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
                        if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
                                continue;
-                       if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+                       if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
                                continue;
 
                        ctx.chain = chain;
@@ -11054,7 +11062,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
        ctx.family = table->family;
        ctx.table = table;
        list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
-               if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+               if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
                        continue;
 
                ctx.chain = chain;